Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques a public figure's performance during a high school graduation speech, focusing on the perceived quality and coherence of the speech. It highlights specific issues such as rambling and difficulty with pronunciation, which could be seen as a form of public discourse as it indirectly touches on the capabilities of a public official.
- The statement could be seen as causing harm by publicly criticizing an elderly public figure's speech performance, potentially affecting her dignity. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in hate speech or harassment, but it does not fully respect the dignity of the speaker by highlighting her age and perceived failings. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it focuses on personal failings rather than offering constructive feedback or engaging in a broader discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.