In reply to:
Michael Brand
@michaelbrandorg
·
29d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
29d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the implications of Trump's deregulation policies on public health and safety. It questions the rationale behind supporting such policies and expresses concern over their potential negative impact.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm from deregulation, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by highlighting the dangers of deregulation, though it could be more empathetic in tone. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue by questioning the rationale behind supporting deregulation, but it could be seen as confrontational rather than constructive. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about public safety concerns, aligning with the principle of bettering society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing public policy issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.