Michael Schellenberger

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by discussing defense spending among NATO countries, particularly focusing on Germany's contributions relative to the United States. The conversation critiques Germany's defense expenditure and its political actions, suggesting a reevaluation of the US-Germany relationship within NATO. The tone is critical and suggests a need for policy reassessment.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement critiques Germany's defense spending and political actions, which could be seen as a call for policy change, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by advocating for fairer defense contributions. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement could be seen as disrespectful to Germany's political decisions, potentially violating the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, potentially violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [-1]