In reply to:
Pablo Eder
@pablothee
·
60d
Connor Axiotes
@connoraxiotes
·
62d
The statement is part of a discussion about beliefs regarding AGI and AI risks, which are public issues. The tone is inquisitive and corrective, aiming to clarify a misunderstanding.
- The statement does no harm and seeks to clarify a misunderstanding, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by addressing a potential misconception. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.