Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
5/9/2025, 4:53:29 PM
X
In reply to:
Ryan Hickman
@ryanmhickman
·
59d
@GaryMarcus @sama 👍 That second sentence is key, so what do you think the time gap is?

ChatGPT was neat in late 2022, but it probably wasn't until late 2024 that I started using them daily.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
59d
Funny, I agree with @sama on this roadmap, but the dates are all wrong.

None of this will happen with reliability when he says it will.
VraserX e/acc
@VraserX
·
60d
Sam Altman’s Roadmap to the Intelligence Age (2025–2027)
The most mind-blowing timeline ever casually dropped in a Senate hearing.

2025 — The Rise of the Super Assistant
AI becomes your second brain.
•It reads, writes, schedules, negotiates.
•Personal assistants smarter than

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the timeline and feasibility of advanced AI technologies, challenging optimistic projections. It questions the reliability and scientific basis of these predictions, emphasizing the need for long-term studies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to do no harm by providing a cautious perspective on AI development timelines. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by highlighting the complexity and time required for reliable AI advancements. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the feasibility of the proposed timeline without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]