In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
61d
David Scott Patterson
@davidpattersonx
·
61d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the societal implications of AI and automation on employment, countering claims about the rapid replacement of human jobs by AI. It provides a factual counterpoint to the hyperbolic predictions about AI's impact on employment, suggesting a more measured and evidence-based perspective.
- The statement strives to do no harm by providing a factual and balanced perspective, countering exaggerated claims that could cause unnecessary fear or anxiety. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by offering a realistic view of AI's current impact on jobs, encouraging a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the claims made in the previous conversation without resorting to personal attacks or dismissive language. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to provide a factual counter-narrative, contributing to a balanced public discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.