In reply to:
❌Snooterville❌ 🇺🇸
@snooterville
·
27d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
27d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the topic of regulation and its impact on public health and prosperity, responding to a claim about overregulation suppressing growth. It challenges the notion that regulations are inherently negative by highlighting their role in ensuring safety and health.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather questions the validity of the opposing viewpoint, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing examples of regulations that protect public health, encouraging a more nuanced view of the issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the opposing viewpoint without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of engaging in dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.