Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 99

The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the implications of AI on copyright law, a significant public issue. The tone is positive and celebratory, highlighting a perceived victory for content creators in the realm of copyright policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and celebrates a decision that aligns with protecting creators' rights. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding and empathy for content creators affected by AI technologies. [+1]
  3. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight a policy decision that could benefit society by protecting intellectual property rights. [+1]