Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
40d
The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by discussing censorship, free speech, and international relations. The tone is critical and suggests a conspiracy involving prominent figures and organizations. It challenges the actions of the EU and UK regarding social media regulation and implies a threat to free speech.
- The statement suggests that censorship is more dangerous than free speech, which could be seen as promoting a particular viewpoint without considering potential harms of misinformation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The mention of specific individuals and organizations in a conspiratorial context may not respect their privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a confrontational tone, potentially leading to polarization. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.