Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement criticizes Donald Trump's decision to terminate Shira Perlmutter, suggesting it was an unprecedented and legally unfounded action. It implies a connection between this termination and Perlmutter's refusal to support Elon Musk's controversial use of copyrighted materials.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does make serious allegations without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on accusations rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a personal attack on Donald Trump without engaging with the broader context or evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to the strong, unsubstantiated claims. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.