Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/12/2025, 6:10:07 PM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
223d
@GaryMarcus Let’s go with your characterization for a sec, how is that different— keep in mind it’s 2025 - than the Dem Party’s help black people policy values?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
223d
@olivia_p_walker yes SA is bad; many places are.

the new US policy is basically to help white people.
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
223d
@GaryMarcus Gary, are you aware of what’s happening in SA regardless of race? It’s not good. And in my opinion, government-sponsored race based discrimination is bad regardless of the race of persons getting discriminated against and/or the race of the officials doing the discrimination.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
223d
So much for Liberty.
The New York Times
@nytimes
·
223d
The first plane carrying Afrikaners, white South Africans who received refugee status from the Trump administration, landed in the U.S. on Monday morning, even as the administration has halted most refugee admissions. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/…

The conversation involves a discussion on race-based policies and discrimination, referencing U.S. policies and historical context. The tone is critical and somewhat accusatory, focusing on perceived racial biases in government actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and conversation highlight perceived racial discrimination, which could perpetuate harm by reinforcing divisive narratives. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The discussion involves sensitive racial issues, and the tone may not fully respect the dignity of all groups involved. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation lacks empathy and understanding, focusing more on criticism than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The exchange is critical but lacks constructive engagement, focusing on accusations rather than solutions. [-1]