Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/12/2025, 9:12:43 PM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
223d
@GaryMarcus Your double downs on this amuse me. don’t get me wrong, I love the innovations in AI and love watching how they’ve (LLMs) improved, but what does “PHD” level mean? Do we mean AA admit PHD or what? What does that mean? How is that measured?

I’ll actually read your article then
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
223d
If you think AI is “smart” or “PhD level” or that it “has an IQ of 120”, take five minutes to read my latest newsletter (link below), as I challenge ChatGPT to the incredibly demanding task of drawing a map of major port cities with above average income.

The results aren’t

The statement engages in a discussion about the capabilities of AI, specifically addressing claims about AI reaching 'PhD level' intelligence. It questions the validity and measurement of such claims, contributing to a broader debate on AI capabilities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive debate. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by questioning and seeking clarification on AI capabilities. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]