In reply to:
Dr. Émile P. Torres
@xriskology
·
224d
The statement involves a discussion about a public figure's worldview, specifically related to TESCREAL (a term often associated with technological and existential risk discussions). The conversation touches on public discourse as it involves societal issues related to technology and its implications.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as critical of the public figure's views.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it lacks context and depth. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is somewhat dismissive and lacks constructive criticism, potentially engaging in ad hominem by comparing to Elizabeth Holmes. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.