Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 83

Reposted by Gary Marcus

Despite his low p(doom), @GaryMarcus agrees that, conditional on the creation of AGI, it causing "very serious harm," and killing greater than 10% of all humans, "is actually fairly likely."

Liron Shapira

@liron

226d

GARY MARCUS ON DOOM DEBATES!!!

Prof. @GaryMarcus is one of the most influential voices in AI.

He claims P(Doom) < 1% because humanity's “immune system” is good at neutralizing threats before the whole population perishes.

We cover:
* Gary's AI Skepticism
* Kluge
* The 2023

5/15/2025, 11:55:56 AM

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the potential risks of AGI, a significant societal issue. It presents a viewpoint on the likelihood of AGI causing harm, contributing to the debate on AI safety.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement raises awareness about potential risks of AGI, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by encouraging caution. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By discussing the potential risks, it promotes understanding and awareness of AGI's implications. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement presents a viewpoint without personal attacks, engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]