The statement expresses strong disagreement with NYU's decision to withhold a student's diploma due to a speech addressing the situation in Palestine. It frames the university's action as an attempt to silence a movement against perceived injustices.
- The statement uses strong language ('sick') which may not promote a constructive dialogue, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the tone could be seen as dismissive of opposing views.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote awareness and empathy for the Palestinian cause, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses a confrontational tone, which may hinder constructive criticism and dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for a social cause, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement supports free speech by criticizing the university's action, aligning with the principle of upholding free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.