Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes the response to a public figure's objection to U.S. policies affecting Gaza and Medicaid. It uses strong language to highlight perceived moral failings in government actions.
- The statement aims to highlight harm caused by government actions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but uses strong language that could be seen as disrespectful, slightly violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes empathy for affected children, aligning with promoting understanding and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It criticizes government actions but does not engage in personal attacks, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.