Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critique of the political parties in the context of their policy priorities, particularly focusing on social welfare and military spending. It suggests that both parties fail to support progressive social policies while endorsing high military budgets.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather critiques policy priorities, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the perceived shortcomings in political priorities, aligning with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of political parties but does not resort to personal attacks, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight societal issues, aiming for the betterment of society by advocating for policy changes. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing public issues with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.