Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses a strong opinion on the U.S. government's actions in Gaza, framing it as contrary to American values. It engages with public issues related to foreign policy and justice, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement uses strong language to criticize government actions, which could be seen as harmful to those who support these actions, but it does not directly harm individuals. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting perceived injustices, aligning with this principle. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on policy criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to advocate for what they believe is a betterment of society by calling for justice and decency. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a significant public issue with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.