Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the motivations behind political and business decisions, suggesting they are driven by personal interests rather than public good. It questions the logic of international trade policies related to AI technology, implying inconsistency and potential self-interest.
- The statement aims to highlight perceived inconsistencies and self-interest in policy decisions, which could be seen as promoting transparency and accountability, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but critiques actions and policies, respecting the dignity of individuals involved. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of policy decisions, questioning their logic and potential implications. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.