In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
59d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the German government's designation of the AfD as an extremist organization, a significant political and societal issue. It questions the legitimacy of the government's actions and suggests deception, which can influence public opinion and debate.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by accusing the government of lying without providing evidence, which may undermine trust in public institutions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but challenges the dignity of the government by labeling its actions as deceptive. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging the government's perspective. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, as it uses strong language like 'lied' and 'Stasi-like' without offering a balanced discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion, but the integrity of the influence is questionable due to the lack of evidence and balanced discussion. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.