Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement criticizes a public figure, Nancy Faeser, accusing her of being a threat to democracy and free speech. It uses strong language, comparing her actions to those of the Stasi, and calls for her removal from power. The tone is accusatory and alarmist.
- The statement uses inflammatory language, which could be seen as harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It attacks a public figure's character without substantial evidence, potentially violating privacy and dignity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against a specific individual, but not necessarily for societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.