Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement reflects on changes in AI regulation since a significant event, suggesting a negative shift. It engages with public issues related to AI policy and governance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to inform about changes in AI regulation, potentially highlighting issues that could cause harm if not addressed. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By discussing AI regulation, it may promote understanding and awareness of important policy changes. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement seems to critique changes in AI regulation, which could foster dialogue and debate. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to address societal issues related to AI regulation. [+1]