Rashida Tlaib

Rank 3 of 47
|
Score 213

The statement expresses strong disapproval of a policy decision regarding PFAS chemicals and emphasizes the potential public health risks. It advocates for clean water as a human right and criticizes the rollback of protections.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a public health concern, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for safer water standards. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding and empathy by emphasizing the health risks associated with PFAS and the importance of clean water. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement criticizes a policy decision but does not engage in personal attacks, focusing instead on the implications of the decision. [+1]