The statement expresses strong disapproval of a policy decision regarding PFAS chemicals and emphasizes the potential public health risks. It advocates for clean water as a human right and criticizes the rollback of protections.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to highlight a public health concern, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for safer water standards.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.It promotes understanding and empathy by emphasizing the health risks associated with PFAS and the importance of clean water.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement criticizes a policy decision but does not engage in personal attacks, focusing instead on the implications of the decision.
[+1]