In reply to:
Thomas G. Dietterich
@tdietterich
·
229d
Future of Life Institute
@FLI_org
·
229d
The statement and linked content engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of AI policy and regulation in the United States. It discusses the balance between federal and state regulations, emphasizing the importance of allowing states to have a role in AI legislation. The conversation involves multiple stakeholders, including state legislators and organizations, highlighting a collaborative approach to policy-making.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for thoughtful regulation that considers both federal and state perspectives. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the contributions of state-level ideas to federal regulation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to differing opinions on AI regulation without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to advocate for a balanced approach to AI policy, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.