Michael Schellenberger

Rank 35 of 47
|
Score -48

The statement expresses approval of a Supreme Court decision, indicating a belief that the decision was correct and decisive. It engages in public discourse by discussing a legal decision related to deportations under wartime law, which is a significant public issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and supports a legal decision, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clearly stating an opinion on a public issue, though it does not elaborate on the reasoning. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks and maintains a focus on the decision itself, aligning with constructive dialogue. [+1]