Michael Schellenberger

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -61
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
121d
Over the last two and a half years, the two of us, @shellenberger and @galexybrane, have written and published hundreds of articles and testified before Congress on multiple occasions about the clear violations of the spirit and letter of the Constitution by former President Joe
5/16/2025, 8:58:26 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
63d
7-2 decision. Not even close.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
122d
Every single Trump advisor, including and especially @StephenM, knows perfectly well that what they did is unconstitutional.
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
·
123d
WATCH IN FULL: White House Deputy Chief of Staff @StephenM schools Fake News CNN's @kasie on the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law.

The statement and conversation involve a discussion on a Supreme Court decision related to deportations under wartime law, which is a matter of public interest and legal interpretation. The tone appears to be critical of actions taken by Trump advisors, suggesting they knowingly acted unconstitutionally. This engages with public discourse on constitutional law and the actions of political figures.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but criticizes actions perceived as unconstitutional.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in a form of public criticism.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not appear to engage in personal attacks.