Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/17/2025, 4:56:55 PM
X
In reply to:
ChrisUniverse 🗽
@ChrisUniverseB
·
229d
@iruletheworldmo @Kantrowitz @GaryMarcus Honestly, he isn’t — I understand where you come from though. After watching this interview I see things in a completely different view because he is right about a few things and now where's GPT 5?
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
229d
@ChrisUniverseB @Kantrowitz @GaryMarcus gary’s an idiot. probably worse than that he’s a dishonest shill.
ChrisUniverse 🗽
@ChrisUniverseB
·
229d
I am waiting till I finish the interview but I don’t appreciate how @Kantrowitz was trying to talk down on @GaryMarcus during this interview saying “I wanna ask you when are you going to admit that you were wrong about things or if you ever will”

Looking back, Gary has been
ChrisUniverse 🗽
@ChrisUniverseB
·
229d
@testingcatalog 😂 bro, I am currently watching this — it’s a great video and I think people should start listening to @GaryMarcus https://www.youtube.com/watch?si…

The statement involves a public discussion about AI manipulation and the credibility of a public figure, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is accusatory and involves personal attacks, which detracts from constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement violates the principle of doing no harm by engaging in personal attacks. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, engaging in cyberbullying and potentially defamatory language. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement fails to promote constructive criticism and instead resorts to ad hominem attacks. [-2]