Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a broader conversation about the use of logic and the scientific method in public discourse, particularly in the context of AI and its societal impact. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and defensive, indicating a debate over the effectiveness of logic in convincing others.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but implies frustration with the inability to convince others using logic, which could be seen as dismissive.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it suggests that logic is ineffective in the discourse, potentially alienating those who disagree. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in a form of dialogue but does not constructively address the disagreement, instead implying that logic is futile, which could be seen as dismissive rather than engaging. [-1]