The statement expresses disagreement with the idea that superintelligence could emerge soon, citing the existence of many unsolved problems. It engages in public discourse by addressing the timeline and feasibility of superintelligence, a significant topic in AI ethics and development.
- The statement does not cause harm and simply expresses a differing opinion.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy but is a straightforward disagreement.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging the plausibility of the claim without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.