In reply to:
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
241d
The statement challenges a claim about a significant increase in software engineering productivity, questioning its empirical support. It engages in public discourse by addressing the validity of claims related to technological advancements and their economic impact.
- The statement does not cause harm and seeks to clarify the validity of a claim, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By questioning the empirical support for a claim, the statement promotes understanding and encourages evidence-based discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the claim without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.