Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/18/2025, 1:10:26 AM
X
In reply to:
Leonid Kruglyak
@leonidkruglyak
·
242d
@GaryMarcus It's kind of tautological to argue that superintelligence could be here soon if someone figures out how to create superintelligence in an unspecified and currently completely unknown way
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
242d
Happy to bet Nick Bostrom $100,000 proceeds to charity, that I can find a dozen problems that human can readily solve that AI’s cannot reliably solve, two years from today.
Haider.
@slow_developer
·
242d
Nick Bostrom says we can no longer be confident that Superintelligence is far away

It could emerge within a year or two, or even sooner, if someone in any AI lab discovers a key unlock we've all missed

The conversation involves a debate on the emergence of superintelligence and AI capabilities, which is a public issue. The tone is analytical and speculative, with a focus on the potential timeline for AI advancements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The discussion does not cause harm and is focused on a speculative debate about AI. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding of differing viewpoints on AI development timelines. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The participants engage in constructive criticism and debate without personal attacks. [+1]