In reply to:
Jonas Persson
@BishopBlougram
ยท
242d
The statement is part of a discussion on the limitations of AI, specifically GPT-4, in understanding and reasoning, as opposed to merely recognizing patterns. The conversation critiques the AI's ability to handle complex tasks like chess, highlighting the difference between pattern recognition and true reasoning. The reply 'this is exactly what i was trying to say' indicates agreement with the critique, reinforcing the argument about AI's limitations.
- The statement does not cause harm and contributes to a constructive discussion about AI capabilities.ย [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by agreeing with a critique that clarifies the limitations of AI.ย [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by supporting a point made in the conversation without resorting to personal attacks.ย [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.