Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement critiques the concept of 'vibe coding,' suggesting that while some software can be used by nontechnical people, it often results in buggy and non-production-grade software. The tone is cautionary, highlighting potential pitfalls for nontechnical users engaging in software development without adequate skills.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to prevent harm by warning about the potential issues of nontechnical people creating buggy software. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by explaining the limitations of 'vibe coding' for nontechnical users. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the potential downsides of 'vibe coding' without attacking individuals. [+1]