Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 83

-3

@martin_casado Calling Judah stupid is stupid. And every new system creates new abstractions. So I don’t really even understand your argument.

His key point is really that these kinds of systems introduce technical debt and other problems that naive users can’t fix.

That is surely true of

5/18/2025, 2:10:41 AM

In reply to:

martin_casado

@martin_casado

244d

While I agree in part with Judah's conclusion, his comparison makes no sense.

Low code platforms are easier to use because they provide higher level abstractions. But in doing so they necessarily create platform specific interfaces, tend to create walled gardens (e.g. Flash)

The statement engages in a discussion about the implications of low-code platforms and their impact on software development. It critiques the argument by addressing the technical debt and challenges faced by naive users. However, it begins with a personal attack, which detracts from constructive dialogue.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement partially adheres to the principle by discussing the technical aspects of low-code platforms, but the personal attack undermines this.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement violates this principle by using a derogatory term, which disrespects the dignity of others. [-2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism due to the personal attack, though it attempts to address the argument's substance. [-1]