In reply to:
Pete Thorne
@ee0pdt
·
246d
The statement reflects a personal opinion on HyperCard, acknowledging its influence but clarifying its limitations. It engages in a broader discussion about the impact of early development tools on modern technology, contributing to the discourse on technological evolution.
- The statement does no harm and is respectful in tone. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by providing a personal perspective on the historical impact of HyperCard. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages constructively by adding to the conversation without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.