Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/18/2025, 12:57:14 PM
X
In reply to:
Johannes Miertschischk
@SeriousStuff42
路
247d
@GaryMarcus Nick Bostrom's completely meaningless statements are part of a phenomenon that's becoming increasingly common among so-called experts.

I call it
'sophisticated bullshit'

Essentially, the content is always utter nonsense, but it's delivered with impressive self-confidence by
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
247d
Before I go to bed, I want to share one important observation: for all we know, we could be just one unlock and 3-6 weeks away from levitation, interstellar travel, immortality, or room temperature superconductors, or perhaps even all four!
Haider.
@slow_developer
路
247d
Nick Bostrom says we can no longer be confident that Superintelligence is far away

It could emerge within a year or two, or even sooner, if someone in any AI lab discovers a key unlock we've all missed

The statement by @SeriousStuff42 is a dismissive agreement with a critique of Nick Bostrom's statements, labeling them as 'sophisticated bullshit.' This conversation involves public discourse as it critiques public figures and their contributions to discussions on AI and technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses the contributions of a public figure without constructive engagement.聽[-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement lacks respect for the dignity of others, as it engages in dismissive language that could be seen as cyberbullying or harassment.聽[-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not promote constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks rather than engaging with the content of the argument.聽[-1]