Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/18/2025, 1:12:23 PM
X
In reply to:
There is no other room 🇬🇪
@uhbif19
·
247d
@GaryMarcus @davidmanheim @XRobservatory But it does not make errors like that in text. It just have bad image comprehension, that is all.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
247d
@davidmanheim @uhbif19 @XRobservatory What’s your theory of the psychology of a system that can make an error like that?
David Manheim
@davidmanheim
·
247d
@uhbif19 @XRobservatory @GaryMarcus was initially claiming that "LLMs that don’t understand clocks and time zones." I agree that image generation is not yet at a point where it gets this right, and that's a real flaw in the models, but the original claim as stated is false.
There is no other room 🇬🇪
@uhbif19
·
247d
@davidmanheim @XRobservatory But that is code, the issue is with the direct image output.
David Manheim
@davidmanheim
·
247d
@XRobservatory How about this - we don't need to push to do anything substantive about banning more risky models until LLMs can generate accurate clocks.

...can we get started now?
David Manheim
@davidmanheim
·
247d
@GaryMarcus Also, the most recent models are able to do this just fine.
Existential Risk Observatory ⏸
@XRobservatory
·
247d
Everyone always said AI was going to be spiky: being great at some things humans are bad at, while being bad at other things humans are good at. Repeating the latter is not an argument.

What we should do instead is raise awareness and implement timeline-independent regulation!

The statement engages in a technical discussion about the capabilities of AI systems, specifically regarding image generation and its role in evaluating a system's 'world model.' The tone is inquisitive and seeks to understand differing perspectives on AI evaluation methods.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive technical discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by questioning and seeking clarification on AI evaluation methods. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]