Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 83

@XRobservatory No, in part because it empowers the very bad actors most likely to cause problems, accelerating race pressures, and giving them more resources to move faster.

5/18/2025, 7:28:52 PM

In reply to:

Existential Risk Observatory ⏸

@XRobservatory

250d

Usually, communicating progress cautiously is good. The worst case is that you fail to deliver progress.

In existential risk, however, the worst case is that your invention does better than expected. Risk management dictates worst case communication: maximum progress.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

250d

@uhbif19 @davidmanheim @XRobservatory are you kidding? they run on hype! :)

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the societal issue of how technological advancements, particularly in AI, can empower harmful actors and exacerbate racial tensions. The tone is cautionary, highlighting potential negative consequences of rapid technological progress without adequate risk management.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to do no harm by warning against empowering bad actors, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding of the risks associated with technological progress, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of the approach to technological progress, without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]