Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
5/19/2025, 2:35:41 AM
X
In reply to:
Think out of the sphere
@ThinkOutaSphere
·
49d
@marwilliamson @Holden_Culotta I’ll do some research. I‘m pretty sure all the gang rule democracies ended up being ruled by one person. I’ll find some examples.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
49d
@ThinkOutaSphere @Holden_Culotta historically, that is simply not true.
Think out of the sphere
@ThinkOutaSphere
·
49d
@marwilliamson @Holden_Culotta Historically, all democracies have turned into dictatorships.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
49d
@ThinkOutaSphere @Holden_Culotta That is simply untrue! Not “all democracies have turned into dictatorships”, far from it. And we are a constitutional Republic as well as a representative democracy.
Think out of the sphere
@ThinkOutaSphere
·
50d
@Holden_Culotta All democracies have turned into dictatorships, that's why they made the US a federal constitutional republic.
Holden Culotta
@Holden_Culotta
·
50d
Washington feared that the despotism of two-party tyranny was destined to collapse into dictatorship.

“The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual, and sooner or later the chief of

The statement engages in a discussion about the historical and potential future trajectories of democracies, using examples like Hungary and Germany to illustrate points about political transitions. It aims to contribute to a broader conversation about the stability and evolution of democratic systems.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and aims to provide historical context, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By referencing historical examples, the statement seeks to promote understanding of political dynamics, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing examples and counterpoints to previous claims, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]