Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement criticizes the UK government's plans to change copyright law in favor of AI companies, arguing it would harm young people's legacy. The tone is confrontational, using strong language to express disagreement.
- The statement aims to protect artists' rights, aligning with the principle of doing no harm, but the aggressive language could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of derogatory language towards a government official violates the principle of respecting dignity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in personal attacks, which violates the principle of constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to address a societal issue, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.