Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a conversation about the capabilities of language models in playing chess, specifically addressing the issue of making illegal moves. The tone is defensive, as the user is responding to an accusation of 'moving the goalposts' by asserting that they have consistently used 'illegal moves' as a benchmark. This exchange touches on the broader public discourse about the capabilities and limitations of AI models.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual rebuttal to a previous comment.
2. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in dialogue by addressing a disagreement. However, it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the topic. [+1]