Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
5/19/2025, 6:00:02 PM
X
In reply to:
TechnicalBen
@_TechyBen
·
253d
@GaryMarcus Gary. I love your enthusiasm. But you'd have solved Turing if you can confirm a nin trivial behaviour of the program named Stockfish.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
253d
@_TechyBen I am pretty sure Stockfish never, ever makes illegal moves.
TechnicalBen
@_TechyBen
·
253d
Chess engines can also be flummoxed by custom end game setups.

Obviously less so for Stockfish etc.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
255d
𝗔𝗯𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗴𝗶𝗯𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗳𝗮𝗿 𝗟𝗟𝗠𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝗚𝗜

I asked a slightly unusual question (“Create a chess position in which white has 3 queens but will lose on the next move”) and the system

The statement is a clarification in a technical discussion about chess engines and their behavior. It aims to correct a misunderstanding about the relevance of Stockfish in the context of the conversation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm; it seeks to clarify a point. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by addressing a specific misunderstanding. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by focusing on the topic rather than personal attacks. [+1]