Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the limitations of language models (LLMs) in understanding and applying rules, using chess as an example. It critiques the capabilities of GPT-4, suggesting it cannot reliably follow chess rules or retain certain knowledge over time.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not cause harm and is a factual critique of LLM capabilities. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   It promotes understanding by highlighting specific limitations of LLMs, encouraging informed discussion. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the technology rather than individuals. [+1]