Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement addresses issues related to international intelligence operations, terrorism, and geopolitical concerns, which are significant public issues. The tone suggests a critique of the stated intentions of the French foreign intelligence, implying a discrepancy between their public claims and actual focus.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it implies a critique of intelligence operations, which could have broader implications.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not disclosing specific personal information or engaging in hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on revealing alleged discrepancies in intelligence operations.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the French foreign intelligence's actions, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of acknowledgment or correction of mistakes within the statement itself.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to highlight potential discrepancies in intelligence operations, which could be seen as contributing to public awareness and debate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing public issues and uses the platform to raise concerns about intelligence operations. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.