Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement critiques the reputation of a public figure, referencing data and protests to support the claim. It challenges another user's perspective, suggesting they are ignoring evidence. The tone is assertive and somewhat dismissive.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as dismissive, potentially causing harm by undermining another's viewpoint without fostering understanding. [-1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on discrediting the other person's perspective. [-1]