Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47

Score 83

Reposted by Gary Marcus

“When voters are demanding protection—& global leaders are sounding the alarm—Congress shouldn’t tie the hands of the only actors currently positioned to lead. A decade of deregulation isn’t a path forward. It’s an abdication of responsibility.” 🙏🏼
—@GaryMarcus @katiefryhester

Lawfare

@lawfare

257d

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/art…

5/20/2025, 7:27:30 PM

The statement is a critique of a legislative proposal that would limit state regulation on AI, arguing that it would hinder effective leadership and responsibility in AI policy. It emphasizes the need for protection and responsible governance.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for protective measures in AI policy. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the concerns of voters and global leaders regarding AI regulation. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of Congress's actions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]