Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the optimistic predictions about the availability of advanced technologies, specifically AGI and self-driving cars, and suggests skepticism based on past experiences. It engages in public discourse by addressing the broader issue of technological predictions and their impact on public expectations.
- The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a critical yet non-aggressive tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement encourages skepticism and critical thinking, which can promote understanding, but it does not explicitly foster empathy or compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of past technological predictions without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by critiquing technological predictions and encouraging public skepticism, aligning with the principle of using one's platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.