Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
5/21/2025, 1:29:56 PM
X
In reply to:
Javier Luraschi
@javierluraschi
·
258d
@GaryMarcus Hey I was there! You should watch the entire session, you’ll find so many fun things to tear apart 😅
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
258d
Am pretty disgusted these days and this is a good example of why.

The NYT’s Kevin Roose likes to repeat what fits his own narrative, and to ignore past broken promises, like Brin’s own promise (in 2012) that Google's self-driving cars would be available for everyone within five
Kevin Roose
@kevinroose
·
258d
Sergey Brin showed up unannounced at Google I/O to talk about why the possibility of AGI brought him out of retirement.

Brin says that while it’s not a race, “we fully intend that Gemini will be the first AGI.”

The statement is part of a broader discussion about AI development and public figures' promises. It reflects skepticism and critique of past claims about technological advancements. The tone is dismissive, indicating a reluctance to engage further with the content of the session.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses the opportunity for constructive engagement.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The dismissive tone does not promote understanding or empathy. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement avoids engaging in constructive dialogue, opting instead for a dismissive response. [-1]