Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement and its context engage in a substantive discussion about the potential risks and consequences of AI development, particularly focusing on the near-term impacts rather than the distant possibility of AGI. The conversation highlights concerns about the misuse and overuse of AI technologies that are not aligned with human values, contributing to public discourse on AI safety and ethics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about the potential harm of AI misuse, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and awareness of AI risks, fostering empathy and compassion for potential consequences. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue about AI risks without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight important societal issues related to AI safety. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss AI risks, upholding free speech principles. [+2]