Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement lists individuals and entities allegedly charged, investigated, or threatened with investigation by Trump or his team, suggesting a critique of political or legal actions taken by or associated with Trump. This implies engagement with public issues related to political power dynamics and legal processes.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of actions taken by Trump or his team, which could be seen as harmful if unfounded. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does mention individuals by name, which could be sensitive.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it lists names without context or explanation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it merely lists names without further discussion or analysis. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement could be seen as using influence to highlight potential misuse of power, but it lacks context or constructive suggestions for societal betterment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing public figures and actions but lacks responsibility and integrity due to the absence of context or evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.